MedElevator
Войти в исследования World neurosurgery · 2026
A Novel Radiation-Free Navigation Method for Robotic Pedicle Screw Placement Using Three-Dimensional Printed Guide Templates: A Cadaveric Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bao Yi, Bian Ce, Luo Hao-Tian, Yang Xiong-Gang, Lu Sheng
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted spinal surgery has advanced surgical accuracy but increased radiation exposure for both staff and patients, raising safety concerns. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement performed with a three-dimensional (3D)-printed navigation guide plate for robotic registration and to determine whether equivalent precision can be achieved without intraoperative imaging.
METHODS: Seven fresh-frozen human cadaveric torsos underwent preoperative computed tomography of the thoracic spine. Reverse-engineering principles were used to design patient-specific 3D-printed navigation guide plates that were recognized by the robot's binocular vision system (XGK-6508A). After automatic guide-pin insertion, 168 thoracic pedicle screws (T1-T12 bilaterally) were implanted. Postoperative computed tomography assessed accuracy against preoperative planning using the Gertzbein-Robbins Scale, deviation distance (mm), and deviation angle (°). Implantation time per screw was recorded.
RESULTS: A total of 98% of screws met acceptable Gertzbein-Robbins Scale grades (Grade A 85%, Grade B 13%). Mean deviation distance at entry and exit points was 0.4 ± 0.3 mm and 0.5 ± 0.3 mm in the sagittal plane and 0.3 ± 0.2 mm and 0.4 ± 0.2 mm in the axial plane, respectively. Mean deviation angle was 3.2 ± 2.0° sagittally and 2.4 ± 4.5° axially. The mean implantation time per screw was 2.4 ± 1.7 min. Average insertion time decreased from 8.0 ± 4.5 min per screw in the first three cadavers (72 screws) to 1.8 ± 2.2 min in the last four (96 screws) (P = 0.012).
CONCLUSION: 3D-printed navigation guide plates enable accurate, radiation-free robot-assisted thoracic pedicle screw placement. Surgical efficiency improved markedly with experience, supporting the technique as a safe alternative to conventional image-guided methods. This study involves no ionizing radiation in its methodology and transforms the traditional registration process for robots, making it safe and efficient.
METHODS: Seven fresh-frozen human cadaveric torsos underwent preoperative computed tomography of the thoracic spine. Reverse-engineering principles were used to design patient-specific 3D-printed navigation guide plates that were recognized by the robot's binocular vision system (XGK-6508A). After automatic guide-pin insertion, 168 thoracic pedicle screws (T1-T12 bilaterally) were implanted. Postoperative computed tomography assessed accuracy against preoperative planning using the Gertzbein-Robbins Scale, deviation distance (mm), and deviation angle (°). Implantation time per screw was recorded.
RESULTS: A total of 98% of screws met acceptable Gertzbein-Robbins Scale grades (Grade A 85%, Grade B 13%). Mean deviation distance at entry and exit points was 0.4 ± 0.3 mm and 0.5 ± 0.3 mm in the sagittal plane and 0.3 ± 0.2 mm and 0.4 ± 0.2 mm in the axial plane, respectively. Mean deviation angle was 3.2 ± 2.0° sagittally and 2.4 ± 4.5° axially. The mean implantation time per screw was 2.4 ± 1.7 min. Average insertion time decreased from 8.0 ± 4.5 min per screw in the first three cadavers (72 screws) to 1.8 ± 2.2 min in the last four (96 screws) (P = 0.012).
CONCLUSION: 3D-printed navigation guide plates enable accurate, radiation-free robot-assisted thoracic pedicle screw placement. Surgical efficiency improved markedly with experience, supporting the technique as a safe alternative to conventional image-guided methods. This study involves no ionizing radiation in its methodology and transforms the traditional registration process for robots, making it safe and efficient.