DOI 10.1007/s00586-024-08513-1
Macrophage polarization and macrophage-related factor expression in hypertrophy of the ligamentum flavum.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Owing to the unknow types of infiltrating macrophages and the corresponded factors, we aimed to investigate the specific types of infiltrating macrophages involved in HLF and the expression of macrophage-related factors.
METHODS
The ligamentum flavum was obtained from patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (HLF group; n = 15) and lumbar disc herniation (non-hypertrophic ligamentum flavum [NLF] group; n = 15). Ligamentum flavum specimens were paraffin embedded, followed by histological and immunohistochemical staining to identify the macrophage type and expression of macrophage-related factors.
RESULTS
The HLF group demonstrated CD206 marker expression, while the NLF group did not (P < 0.0001; n = 11). CD68 marker was expressed in both groups (P > 0.05; n = 11). CCR7 was not expressed in either group. The expression levels of the extracellular matrix proteins aggrecan (Agg), type I collagen (Coll1), and type II collagen (Coll2) were higher in the HLF group than in the NLF group (P < 0.0001; n = 11). The aging markers p21, p16, and p53 were expressed in the HLF group, but not in the NLF group (P < 0.0001; n = 11). The expression levels of the inflammatory factors TNF-α and IL-1β were higher in the HLF group than in the NLF group (P < 0.0001; n = 11). Similarly, the expression level of the fibrosis factor TGF-β1 was higher in the HLF group than in the NLF group (P < 0.0001; n = 11).
CONCLUSIONS
The infiltration of M2 macrophages may be involved in HLF, while involvement of M1 macrophages may only occur early in inflammation. The expression of extracellular matrix proteins and macrophage-related factors was increased. Aging may also be associated with HLF.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.