MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/17531934241232341

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of hand surgery, European volume · 2024

Incision techniques for trigger thumb release: a comparison of outcomes of four types of skin incision.

Koopman Jaimy E, Smit Jeroen M, Wouters Robbert M, Selles Ruud W, Michiel Zuidam J, Hand-Wrist Study Group, Hundepool Caroline A

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Although trigger thumb release is commonly performed, there is no consensus on the optimal skin incision. This study aimed to compare outcomes of four incision techniques, including V-shaped, oblique, transverse and longitudinal incisions. Outcomes included the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, satisfaction with the treatment and postoperative complications. The results of 875 patients who underwent trigger thumb release were assessed. All groups demonstrated improvement in self-reported hand function (range of 10-14 points), pain (25-27 points) and aesthetics (4-7 points) from baseline to 3 months postoperatively with no differences between incision techniques. Of the patients, 76% reported good or excellent satisfaction with the outcome of treatment. Satisfaction and complication rates of the different incision techniques were similar. These findings imply that there is no clear benefit of one type of incision over another for trigger thumb release, suggesting that surgeons may use the technique of their preference.Level of evidence: III.

Для цитирования: Koopman Jaimy E, Smit Jeroen M, Wouters Robbert M, Selles Ruud W, Michiel Zuidam J, Hand-Wrist Study Group, Hundepool Caroline A. Incision techniques for trigger thumb release: a comparison of outcomes of four types of skin incision.. The Journal of hand surgery, European volume. 2024. DOI: 10.1177/17531934241232341.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.