DOI 10.1097/ms9.0000000000002393
Comparative evaluation of knee osteoarthritis: radiography vs. ultrasonography in Nepalese population: a cross-sectional study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVES
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative and long-term debilitating disease with rising prevalence, predominantly involving larger joints including the knee joint. While radiography has traditionally been the primary modality for joint evaluation, there is a growing trend towards using ultrasonography (USG) for musculoskeletal disorders, including joint assessment. This study aimed to find the role of USG in the evaluation of OA of knee joints with comparison to the radiographs.
METHODS
This was a cross-sectional study done on patients with signs and symptoms of OA of the knee who visited the radiology department for knee radiographs. Kellgren and Lawrence system was used for grading OA in radiographs. USG of knee joints was done with high-frequency probes and searched for joint space width, articular cartilage thickness, marginal osteophytes, meniscal extrusion, and other articular/ extra-articular abnormalities. The USG findings were correlated with findings in anteroposterior and lateral radiographs.
RESULTS
The mean number of osteophytes was higher in USG compared to the radiographs (P<0.001). Mean joint spaces were comparable in both modalities. Meniscal extrusion was seen with USG, which significantly correlated with joint space width and cartilage thickness (P<0.005). USG also detected synovial changes, effusion, and Baker's cyst.
CONCLUSION
Although radiography is the standard first-line radiological investigation for the diagnosis of OA of the knee joint, USG can be an adjunct as it well correlates with the radiograph findings and can provide more useful information.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.