DOI 10.22038/ijorl.2026.92496.4079
Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Nasal Cartilage Preserved in Ethanol at 4 °C versus Normal Saline at -18 °C for Rhinoplasty Reuse.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
This study aimed to compare the mechanical properties of nasal cartilage preserved in ethanol at 4 °C versus normal saline at -18 °C, with the goal of assessing their suitability for reuse in subsequent nasal surgeries.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
Twenty nasal septal cartilage samples from patients who had undergone rhinoplasty were preserved for two months using two different methods. Ten cartilages were stored in alcohol at 4 °C, while the remaining ten were stored in normal saline at -18 °C. Additionally, a control group consisting of ten fresh cartilage samples was included for comparison. The mechanical properties (namely Young's modulus, fracture stress, yield stress, ductility, and tensile strength) were measured using a universal tensile testing machine STM-20 and analyzed to evaluate the effects of the preservation methods.
RESULTS
Significant differences were observed between the groups in mean tensile strength, ductility, Young's modulus, and yield stress (P<0.05). However, no significant difference was found in mean fracture stress (P=0.318). The alcohol-preserved group exhibited significantly lower mechanical properties compared to the saline and fresh cartilage groups (P<0.05). No significant differences were detected between the frozen (saline) and fresh cartilage groups (P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Cartilage stored in normal saline at -18 °C retained its mechanical properties better than cartilage preserved in alcohol at 4 °C. Freezing did not adversely affect the mechanical properties, and the slightly higher values observed in the frozen group suggest that lower temperature may enhance cartilage elasticity.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.