Rheumatoid factor by laser nephelometry and Waaler-Rose assay: prognostic value in patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the prognostic value of rheumatoid factor (RF), detected in the Waaler-Rose agglutination assay and by nephelometry, in patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
METHODS
Consecutive patients with new-onset RA between 1993 and 1997 were followed for a median period of 4.7 years. Clinical data at baseline and drug use during the disease course were recorded. Outcome parameters studied were disease process, damage (erosions, joint surgery, extra-articular manifestations, and new co-morbidity), and death. Cut-off levels for RF were >40 IU/mL (nephelometry) and titres 1:160 (Waaler-Rose haemagglutination).
RESULTS
RF tests were negative by both methods in 22% of RA patients (RF- group), while 33% were RF positive by nephelometry only (RF+ group) and 45% were positive by Waaler-Rose and nephelometry (RF++ group). Baseline clinical and laboratory findings as well as the number of subsequently used disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), the number of patients starting and the time spent on steroid therapy were similar in the three RF groups. Odd ratios for death (n = 23), erosions (n = 62), and serious extra-articular disease manifestations (EAMs) (n = 13) as well as patient survival, erosion-free or surgery-free survival rates did not differ between the RF groups. Only rheumatoid nodules were more frequent in RF++ patients.
CONCLUSION
The baseline presence of RF by either Waaler-Rose or nephelometry was not associated with differences in drug therapy, morbidity other than rheumatoid nodules, or mortality in RA patients in the first 5 years of disease. Being immunoglobulin M (IgM) RF positive thus had little impact on RA patient outcome.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.