MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2010.03800.x

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical and experimental dermatology · 2010

Attitudes of dermatologists toward the Chapel Hill Consensus Conference nomenclature and classification.

Kawakami T, Takahashi K, Soma Y, Ikezawa Z

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This study was designed to explore the attitudes of dermatologists towards the Chapel Hill Consensus Conference (CHCC) nomenclature and classification. We developed a questionnaire to determine the views of chief assistant dermatological professors at 61 Japanese university hospitals. A chi2 analysis of the responses found a close relationship between dermatological facilities that based their evaluations on the CHCC and their likelihood of taking confirmatory skin biopsies from patients with suspected microscopic polyangiitis with cutaneous features. In those facilities, the physicians and pathologists tended to consider cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa and cutaneous leucocytoclastic angiitis as independent disease conditions. We believe that it would be beneficial for dermatologists to take advantage of the CHCC, through which an appropriate early diagnosis of vasculitis can be realized. The present investigation provides a picture of current practices of Japanese dermatologists with reference to the management of vasculitis, including the extent to which biopsies are used to establish the diagnosis.

Для цитирования: Kawakami T, Takahashi K, Soma Y, Ikezawa Z. Attitudes of dermatologists toward the Chapel Hill Consensus Conference nomenclature and classification.. Clinical and experimental dermatology. 2010. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2010.03800.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.