MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103301

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025

Radiological assessment in cervical spine myelopathy.

Rajasekaran Shanmuganathan, Gurusamy Gnanaprakash, Thippeswamy Pushpa Bhari, Ramachandran Karthik, Conti Stefano

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction in adults, resulting from conditions such as cervical spondylosis, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), and disc degeneration. Radiological evaluation is essential to diagnosis, surgical planning, and prognosis. This review outlines the current role of imaging modalities, ranging from plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in the assessment of DCM. Plain radiographs and CT scans provide valuable information on cervical alignment, instability, and ossification patterns, while MRI remains the gold standard for evaluating spinal cord compression and changes in signal intensity. Advanced techniques, including diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), and functional MRI (fMRI), offer additional insights into spinal cord integrity and metabolic alterations, though their clinical application remains limited. A systematic and multimodal imaging approach enhances diagnostic precision, helps in surgical decision-making, and supports individualized treatment strategies in patients with cervical myelopathy.

Для цитирования: Rajasekaran Shanmuganathan, Gurusamy Gnanaprakash, Thippeswamy Pushpa Bhari, Ramachandran Karthik, Conti Stefano. Radiological assessment in cervical spine myelopathy.. Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103301.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.