Mid-term results of sub-trochanteric valgus osteotomy for symptomatic late stages Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The treatment of late stages of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD) is controversial. Although the concept of femoral head containment is a well-established technique of treatment, its use remains debatable in the late stages of the disease, as it does not improve symptoms in terms of limb length discrepancy and gait.
AIM: To assess the results of subtrochanteric valgus osteotomy in symptomatic patients with late-stage Perthes disease.
METHODS
From 2000 to 2007, 36 symptomatic patients with late stage of Perthes disease were surgically treated with subtrochanteric valgus osteotomy and followed-up for 8 to 11 years using the IOWA score and range of motion (ROM) variables. The Mose classification was also assessed at the last follow-up to reflect possible remodeling. The patients were 8 years old or older at the time of surgery, in the post-fragmentation stage, and complaining of pain, limited ROM, Trendelenburg gait, and/or abductor weakness.
RESULTS
The preoperative IOWA score (average: 53.3) markedly improved at the 1-year post follow-up period (average: 85.41) and then slightly improved at the last follow-up (average: 89.4) (P value < 0.05). ROM improved, with internal rotation increased on average by 22° (from 10° preoperatively to 32° postoperatively) and abduction increased on average by 15.9° (from 25° preoperatively to 41° postoperatively). The mean Mose deviation of femoral heads was 4.1 mm at the end of the follow-up period. The tests used were the paired t-test and Pearson correlation test, where the level of significance was a P value less than 0.05.
CONCLUSION
Subtrochanteric valgus osteotomy can be a good option for symptomatic relief in patients with late-stage of LCPD.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.