DOI 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2024.107114
Prevalence and clinical features of cervical dystonia in Parkinson's disease.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To study the prevalence and clinical features of cervical dystonia in Parkinson's disease (CD-PD).
BACKGROUND
PD features various forms of dystonia, including CD. Yet, the prevalence and clinical features of CD in PD patients are not well-characterized.
METHODS
We conducted a single site, prospective study where consecutively evaluated PD patients were examined for the presence of CD to ascertain its prevalence. For each case of CD-PD, a standardized questionnaire assessing demographic and clinical features was completed. Statistical analysis was performed to compare CD-PD characteristics to those of a previously published large idiopathic CD cohort.
RESULTS
Of 301 consecutive PD patients evaluated, 28 (9.3 %) had CD, far surpassing estimates of CD prevalence in the general population. This CD-PD cohort was predominantly male (71 %) with a mean age of 70.9 ± 8.1 years. The mean duration of PD was 10.4 ± 6.7 years. In most cases (n = 19, 68 %), CD developed after the onset of PD. Five patients reported dystonia improvements in response to levodopa, while none reported medication-induced worsening. In contrast to CD-PD, those with ICD (n = 209) were on average younger (59.7 ± 10.1) and mostly female (74 %, p < 0.001). In addition, CD-PD was overall less severe as measured by the Global Dystonia Rating Scale (GDRS) (p = 0.002) and featured less head tremor and pain.
CONCLUSION
Our findings indicate CD is overrepresented in PD compared to the general population and has clinical features distinct from those of ICD. These results justify larger, more comprehensive studies of CD-PD to better understand its frequency, pathophysiology, clinical characteristics, and associated risk factors.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.