m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2024

Preoperative spinal education for lumbar spinal stenosis: A feasibility study.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Eubanks James E, Cupler Zachary A, Gliedt Jordan A, Bejarano Geronimo, Skolasky Richard L, Smeets Rob J E M, Schneider Michael J

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a leading cause of chronic musculoskeletal pain among older adults. A common and costly intervention for the treatment of LSS is lumbar decompression with or without fusion (LSS surgery), which has mixed outcomes among patients. Prehabilitation is a strategy designed to optimize the consistency of positive surgical outcomes and promote patient self-efficacy, while attempting to mitigate postoperative complications. No efforts have investigated the prehabilitation strategies specifically for patients undergoing LSS surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of delivery and acceptability by participants of a novel prehabilitation intervention for patients undergoing LSS surgery.

DESIGN: Feasibility study.

SETTING: Outpatient orthopedic clinic at an academic medical center.

PARTICIPANTS: Patients at least 50 years of age, who were scheduled for LSS surgery between October 2020 and October 2021.

INTERVENTION: PreOperative Spinal Education for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (POSE-LSS), is a novel multimodal, education-focused, time-efficient prehabilitation program for patients undergoing LSS surgery. Participants received the following: (1) Educational booklet and video; (2) In-person physical therapy (PT) session; and (3) Telemedicine visit with a physiatrist.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcomes of interest were feasibility and acceptability of intervention by participants. Key potential surgical outcomes were length of stay and discharge disposition.

RESULTS: POSE-LSS was completed by all eligible participants enrolled (n = 15) indicating feasibility and acceptability. Potential effectiveness measures including length of stay and discharge disposition were positively associated with the POSE-LSS intervention.

CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that a novel prehabilitation intervention is feasible, acceptable, and appears positively associated with important short-term measures of postoperative recovery that may impact the trajectory of patient care following LSS surgery.

Предметные рубрики MeSH