MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/rheumatology/ken079

Медицинская библиотека · Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2008

Evaluation of a new algorithm in classification of systemic vasculitis.

Liu L-J, Chen M, Yu F, Zhao M-H, Wang H-Y

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Recently, a new consensus algorithm for classification of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) and PAN had been proposed by Watt et al. for epidemiological studies. In order to evaluate this algorithm, the current study used the algorithm to reclassify the patients with AAV and PAN in our centre.

METHODS

Five hundred and fifty Chinese patients with primary systemic vasculitis diagnosed in our referral diagnostic centre during the past 10 years were retrospectively studied. Four hundred and ninety-three out of 550 were ANCA positive. We compared the new consensus algorithm and the 1994 Chapel Hill Consensus Conference (CHCC) definitions supplemented with surrogate parameters, in the same cohort of patients with primary systemic vasculitis.

RESULTS

Applying the CHCC definitions with surrogate parameters, the diagnoses were Churg-Strauss syndrome (CSS) (n = 0), WG (n = 127), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) (n = 363), PAN (n = 4) and unclassified (n = 56). Using the new consensus algorithm, the diagnoses were CSS (n = 2), WG (n = 199), MPA (n = 329), PAN (n = 0) and unclassified (n = 20).

CONCLUSIONS

Watts' algorithm was a useful method to classify patients into a single category, with less unclassified patients and without overlapping diagnosis, which allows their use in epidemiological studies.

Для цитирования: Liu L-J, Chen M, Yu F, Zhao M-H, Wang H-Y. Evaluation of a new algorithm in classification of systemic vasculitis.. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2008. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken079.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.