DOI 10.1097/bsd.0b013e31817eee55
Comparison of cardiovascular parameters between patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament and patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Аннотация
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is an ectopic bone formation in the ligament tissue of the spine, causing myelopathy as a result of chronic pressure on the spinal cord and nerve roots. It has been further categorized into 4 types, that is, segmental, continuous, mixed types, and the other types; however, differences in the detail of the progression in the ossification and natural history of the disease among these types have not been clarified.
OBJECTIVE
To find out the systemic feature, which has relevance to the disease state of OPLL.
METHODS
To characterize these types, we conducted an investigation of cardiovascular factors [blood pressure, blood loss during or after surgery, bleeding time, coagulation factors (prothrombin test, activated partial thromboplastin time)] among OPLL, cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), and subtypes of OPLL (continuous, mixed, segmental, and the other types).
STUDY
DESIGN
Retrospective case series.
RESULTS
These parameters of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy were used as a control (CSM patients). Although there was no significant difference in bleeding time and coagulation factors, blood loss after surgery of OPLL patients was significantly higher than that of CSM patients (P<0.01). Furthermore, blood loss of patients with continuous type of ossification was significantly higher (P<0.05) than that of patients with segmental type of ossification, which was nearly equal to that of CSM patients. Blood loss of patients with mixed type of ossification showed the value of the middle of segmental and continuous types.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.