DOI 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02387.x
Development and pilot testing of computerized order entry algorithms for geriatric problems in nursing homes.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
To develop order entry algorithms for five common nursing home problems and to test their acceptance, use, and preliminary effect on nine quality indicators and resource utilization.
DESIGN
Pre-post, quasi-experimental study.
SETTING
Two Department of Veterans Affairs nursing homes.
PARTICIPANTS
Randomly selected residents (N=265) with one or more target conditions and 42 nursing home providers.
INTERVENTION: Expert panels developed computerized order entry algorithms based on clinical practice guidelines. Each was displayed on a single screen and included an array of diagnostic and treatment options and means to communicate with the interdisciplinary team.
MEASUREMENTS: Medical records were abstracted for the 6 months before and after deployment for quality indicators and resource utilization.
RESULTS
Despite positive provider attitudes toward the computerized order entry algorithms, their use was infrequent and varied according to condition: falls (73.0%), fever (9.0%), pneumonia (8.0%), urinary tract infection (7.0%), and osteoporosis (3.0%). In subjects with falls, trends for improvements in quality measures were observed for six of the nine measures: measuring orthostatic blood pressure (17.5-30.0%, P=.29), reducing neuroleptics (53.8-75.0%, P=.27), reducing sedative-hypnotics (16.7-50.0%, P=.50), prescription of calcium (22.5-32.5%, P=.45), vitamin D (20.0-35.0%, P=.21), and external hip protectors (25.0-47.5%, P=.06). Little improvement was observed in the other conditions (documentation of vital signs, physical therapy referrals, or reduction of benzodiazepines or antidepressants). There was no change in resource utilization.
CONCLUSION
Computerized order entry algorithms were used infrequently, except for falls. Further study may determine whether their use leads to improved care.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.