Clinical effectiveness of platelet rich fibrin combined with core decompression and grafting in early stage femoral head avascular necrosis.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
This study aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) therapy in combination with core decompression (CD) and grafting in patients with femoral head avascular necrosis (AVNFH).
PATIENTS AND
METHODS
Between February 2015 and February 2020, a total of 63 patients (45 males, 18 females; mean age: 45.8±11.7 years; range, 21 to 65 years) with early-stage AVNFH (Ficat-Arlet Stages I-II) who underwent treatment were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups: those treated with CD and grafting (CD+grafting; n=32) and those receiving additional PRF augmentation (CD+grafting+PRF; n=31). Demographic characteristics, including age, sex, and affected side, were comparable between the groups. Clinical assessments included pre- and postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Harris Hip Score (HHS), and Merle d'Aubigné Hip Score.
RESULTS
No significant differences were observed between the groups preoperatively regarding HHS, Merle d'Aubigné scores, and VAS scores (p>0.05). Postoperatively, the PRF group demonstrated significantly improved outcomes in HHS (83.70±14.30 vs. 65.90±16.72, p=0.001), Merle d'Aubigné Hip Score (15.29±2.78 vs. 11.94±4.31, p=0.001), and VAS (2.06±1.50 vs. 4.69±2.08, p=0.001). Both groups showed significant clinical improvement, but PRF augmentation was associated with superior functional recovery and pain reduction.
CONCLUSION
Compared to CD+grafting alone, adding PRF to CD+grafting resulted in more favorable clinical outcomes with minimal complications. These findings suggest that PRF is a promising, minimally invasive adjunct therapy for joint preservation in early-stage AVNFH.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.