MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i4.1441

Медицинская библиотека · World journal of clinical cases · 2022

Eustachian tube involvement in a patient with relapsing polychondritis detected by magnetic resonance imaging: A case report.

Yunaiyama Daisuke, Aoki Akiko, Kobayashi Hiroshi, Someya Miwako, Okubo Mitsuru, Saito Kazuhiro

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Relapsing polychondritis (RP) is a rare inflammatory disease involving the systemic cartilage, such as the auricle, trachea, and bronchiole, among others. A patient with RP shows variable symptoms based on the involved cartilage.

CASE SUMMARY: A 72-year-old Japanese woman with a history of redness of the bilateral auricles for 3 d was referred to a clinician. The clinician prescribed antibiotics to the patient; however, the symptoms worsened; thus, she was referred to our hospital. Head and neck magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed edematous auricle with remarkable contrast, fluid collection in the bilateral mastoid cells, suggesting otitis media. The eustachian tube (ET) on the right side was also edematous with contrast enhancement. The patient was suspected of RP according to the diagnostic criteria. A biopsy of the auricular cartilage was performed by an otorhinolaryngologist, confirming pathological proof of RP. Treatments with steroids were immediately administered thereafter.

CONCLUSION

We highlight a rare case of RP with radiologically confirmed involvement of ET in the MRI.

Для цитирования: Yunaiyama Daisuke, Aoki Akiko, Kobayashi Hiroshi, Someya Miwako, Okubo Mitsuru, Saito Kazuhiro. Eustachian tube involvement in a patient with relapsing polychondritis detected by magnetic resonance imaging: A case report.. World journal of clinical cases. 2022. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i4.1441.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.