MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1227/ons.0000000000000924

Медицинская библиотека · Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.) · 2023

Percutaneous Juxtapedicular Cement Salvage of Failed Spinal Instrumentation? Institutional Experience and Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.

Kurland David B, Lendhey Matin, Delavari Nader, Winfield Jalen, Mahoney Jonathan M, Becske Tibor, Shapiro Maksim, Raz Eytan, Pacione Donato, Bucklen Brandon S, Frempong-Boadu Anthony K

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES

Instrumented spinal fusion constructs sometimes fail because of fatigue loading, frequently necessitating open revision surgery. Favorable outcomes after percutaneous juxtapedicular cement salvage (perc-cement salvage) of failing instrumentation have been described; however, this approach is not widely known among spine surgeons , and its biomechanical properties have not been evaluated. We report our institutional experience with perc-cement salvage and investigate the relative biomechanical strength of this technique as compared with 3 other common open revision techniques.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent perc-cement salvage was conducted. Biomechanical characterization of revision techniques was performed in a cadaveric model of critical pedicle screw failure. Three revision cohorts involved removal and replacement of hardware: (1) screw upsizing, (2) vertebroplasty, and (3) fenestrated screw with cement augmentation. These were compared with a cohort with perc-cement salvage performed using a juxtapedicular trajectory with the failed primary screw remaining engaged in the vertebral body.

RESULTS

Ten patients underwent perc-cement salvage from 2018 to 2022 to address screw haloing and/or endplate fracture threatening construct integrity. Pain palliation was reported by 8/10 patients. Open revision surgery was required in 4/10 patients, an average of 8.9 months after the salvage procedure (range 6.2-14.7 months). Only one revision was due to progressive hardware dislodgement. The remainder avoided open revision surgery through an average of 1.9 years of follow-up. In the cadaveric study, there were no significant differences in pedicle screw pullout strength among any of the revision cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Perc-cement salvage of failing instrumentation is reasonably efficacious. The technique is biomechanically noninferior to other revision strategies that require open surgery for removal and replacement of hardware. Open revision surgery may be avoided by perc-cement salvage in select cases.

Для цитирования: Kurland David B, Lendhey Matin, Delavari Nader, Winfield Jalen, Mahoney Jonathan M, Becske Tibor, Shapiro Maksim, Raz Eytan, Pacione Donato, Bucklen Brandon S, Frempong-Boadu Anthony K. Percutaneous Juxtapedicular Cement Salvage of Failed Spinal Instrumentation? Institutional Experience and Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.. Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.). 2023. DOI: 10.1227/ons.0000000000000924.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.