MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.110269

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of surgery case reports · 2024

A ganglioglioma versus a schwannoma: Which is in the sacral spine?

Msheik Ali, Fahed Elie, Sebaaly Delivrance, Abadjian Gerard, Younes Philippe

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION AND

IMPORTANCE

Sacral spinal gangliogliomas, rare WHO grade I tumors, present a surgical challenge due to their proximity to critical nerve roots. Symptoms often include lower back pain, sciatica, and bladder dysfunction. Diagnosis is confirmed through MRI and biopsy, with surgical resection being the primary treatment.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 66-year-old woman presented with left lower limb pain and weakness. MRI showed an intradural lesion at the left S1 root. She underwent surgery, resulting in near-total tumor resection. Postoperatively, she was pain-free and ambulatory. Pathology confirmed a ganglioglioma.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Initially suspected as a disc herniation, MRI indicated a schwannoma-like lesion, but surgery and pathology revealed a ganglioglioma. Total resection was challenging due to the tumor's neural adherence. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy are generally not used for low-grade gangliogliomas.

CONCLUSION

Treating sacral spinal gangliogliomas requires precise surgery and a multidisciplinary approach. Accurate diagnosis and careful planning are essential for minimizing neurological risks and improving patient outcomes. Continued research is crucial for advancing treatment strategies.

Для цитирования: Msheik Ali, Fahed Elie, Sebaaly Delivrance, Abadjian Gerard, Younes Philippe. A ganglioglioma versus a schwannoma: Which is in the sacral spine?. International journal of surgery case reports. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.110269.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.