MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00006123-199612000-00042

Медицинская библиотека · Neurosurgery · 1996

Myelopathy caused by retro-odontoid disc hernia: case report.

Nishizawa S, Ryu H, Yokoyama T, Uemura K

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE AND

IMPORTANCE

Among masses in the craniovertebral junction causing severe compression of the medulla and upper cervical cord, cases of retro-odontoid disc hernia are extremely rare. We report a case of retro-odontoid disc hernia resulting in severe myelopathy.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION: An 82-year-old man suffered from progressive tetraparesis. Although cervical radiological studies showed marked spondylotic change, no congenital malformations or traumatic lesions were identified. Magnetic resonance imaging disclosed a retro-odontoid soft tissue mass with peripheral enhancement compressing the medulla and the upper cervical cord posteriorly.

INTERVENTION: The patient underwent surgery through the posterior approach. The histopathological examination of the surgical specimen revealed fibrocartilage accompanied by reactive vascular tissue; the mass was diagnosed as a retro-odontoid disc hernia.

CONCLUSION

In the differential diagnosis of mass lesions compressing the neural structures in the craniovertebral junction, retro-odontoid disc hernia, although extremely rare, should be considered to be one possibility. The posterior approach with wide laminectomies provides a good operative field from which to remove the retro-odontoid mass and is especially adequate for elderly patients, because it is less invasive than other procedures.

Для цитирования: Nishizawa S, Ryu H, Yokoyama T, Uemura K. Myelopathy caused by retro-odontoid disc hernia: case report.. Neurosurgery. 1996. DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199612000-00042.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.