Evaluation of temporomandibular joint disc displacement with MRI-based radiomics analysis.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study was to propose a machine learning model and assess its ability to classify temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc displacements on MR T1-weighted and proton density-weighted images.
METHODS
This retrospective cohort study included 180 TMJs from 90 patients with TMJ signs and symptoms. A radiomics platform was used to extract imaging features of disc displacements. Thereafter, different machine learning algorithms and logistic regression were implemented on radiomics features for feature selection, classification, and prediction. The radiomics features included first-order statistics, size- and shape-based features, and texture features. Six classifiers, including logistic regression, random forest, decision tree, k-nearest neighbours (KNN), XGBoost, and support vector machine were used for a model building which could predict the TMJ disc displacements. The performance of models was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, and ROC curve.
RESULTS
KNN classifier was found to be the most optimal machine learning model for prediction of TMJ disc displacements. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity for the training set were 0.944, 0.771, 0.918 for normal, anterior disc displacement with reduction (ADDwR) and anterior disc displacement without reduction (ADDwoR) while testing set were 0.913, 0.716, and 1 for normal, ADDwR, and ADDwoR. For TMJ disc displacements, skewness, root mean squared, kurtosis, minimum, large area low grey level emphasis, grey level non-uniformity, and long-run high grey level emphasis, were selected as optimal features.
CONCLUSIONS
This study has proposed a machine learning model by KNN analysis on TMJ MR images, which can be used for TMJ disc displacements.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.