m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Legal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2009

Can cervical spine injury be correctly diagnosed by postmortem computed tomography?

Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Iwase Hirotaro, Yamamoto Seiji, Yajima Daisuke, Hayakawa Mutsumi, Kobayashi Kazuhiro, Otsuka Katsura, Sato Kaoru, Motani Hisako, Kasahara Shiori, Ito Hisao

Аннотация

We discuss the usefulness of postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) by reviewing cases of cervical spine injury. A merit of PMCT is that it can identify injury that cannot be found on autopsy; however, peculiar defects of it may exist. While PMCT can identify bone fractures, it cannot indicate whether the injury was inflicted while the deceased was still alive or not because of its inability to clearly image bleeding around the fracture. Furthermore, CT often misses some types of cervical spine injuries, such as laceration of an intervertebral disk and incomplete fracture of the cervical spine. On the other hand, cervical spine injury on CT images occasionally has an appearance similar to subarachnoid hemorrhage due to rupture of the cerebral artery, indicating that cervical spine injury can be misdiagnosed as a disease by PMCT. When PMCT is used for screening trauma, caution must be observed regarding its limitations. If the possibility of trauma of the neck or head is not completely ruled out from the personal history of the victim, autopsy is strongly recommended, even when PMCT findings indicate that the cause of death may be due to disease, such as subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты