MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3171/2025.6.spine25442

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of neurosurgery. Spine · 2025

Spinal versus general anesthesia in robotic minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative study on surgical outcomes.

Navarro-Garcia de Llano Juan P, Rios-Zermeno Jorge, Roberts Andrew P, Iyer Harshvardhan G, Sanchez-Garavito Jesus E, Safa Adrian, Martin Del Campo Isabel, Graepel Stephen, Patterson Jennifer S, White Kate E, Bojaxhi Elird, Navarro-Ramirez Rodrigo, Quiñones-Hinojosa Alfredo, Akinduro Oluwaseun O, Buchanan Ian A, Chen Selby G, Abode-Iyamah Kingsley

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The implementation of robotics and spinal anesthesia (SA) in spine surgery is rapidly expanding, offering significant benefits for an increasingly complex and aging patient population with degenerative spinal disease. Here, the authors present the largest cohort to date evaluating the combined use of these two techniques in minimally invasive (MIS) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

METHODS

The authors retrospectively analyzed surgical outcomes of a series of patients who underwent robot-assisted (RA)-MIS TLIF under SA and general anesthesia (GA) at their institution from 2018 to 2024. Primary outcomes included operative times and postoperative pain intensity. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss, intraoperative complications, postoperative functional status, length of stay (LOS), and discharge status. To address potential confounders, a 1:1 propensity score-matching and regression analysis was implemented. Statistical analyses were conducted using Python.

RESULTS

A total of 209 patients underwent RA-MIS TLIF, with 31 (14.83%) receiving SA and 178 (85.17%) GA. After propensity score matching, the SA cohort demonstrated significantly shorter median total operating room (OR) time, total procedure time, time from entering the OR to skin incision, and time from closure to leaving the OR (all p < 0.01). Additionally, postoperative pain scores were significantly lower (p < 0.01), and LOS was significantly shorter (p < 0.01) in the SA cohort. Regression analysis, adjusting for potential confounders, further supported these findings.

CONCLUSIONS

RA-MIS TLIF fusion under SA is a safe and effective approach that significantly reduces operative time, postoperative pain, and hospital LOS in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative lumbar spine disease.

Для цитирования: Navarro-Garcia de Llano Juan P, Rios-Zermeno Jorge, Roberts Andrew P, Iyer Harshvardhan G, Sanchez-Garavito Jesus E, Safa Adrian, Martin Del Campo Isabel, Graepel Stephen, Patterson Jennifer S, White Kate E, Bojaxhi Elird, Navarro-Ramirez Rodrigo, Quiñones-Hinojosa Alfredo, Akinduro Oluwaseun O, Buchanan Ian A, Chen Selby G, Abode-Iyamah Kingsley. Spinal versus general anesthesia in robotic minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative study on surgical outcomes.. Journal of neurosurgery. Spine. 2025. DOI: 10.3171/2025.6.spine25442.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.