MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jos.2025.09.009

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association · 2025

Comparative analysis of anterior cervical decompression and fusion versus posterior decompression for cervical spondylosis presenting with unilateral proximal upper limb muscle weakness.

Shibata Reo, Nagoshi Narihito, Yamane Junichi, Kono Hitoshi, Nishimura Soraya, Takeda Kazuki, Isogai Norihiro, Ozaki Masahiro, Horiuchi Yosuke, Ishihara Shinichi, Suzuki Satoshi, Okubo Toshiki, Matsumoto Morio, Nakamura Masaya, Watanabe Kota

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

While numerous studies have investigated surgical outcomes for cervical spondylosis, limited research has examined the impact of surgical techniques in patients with unilateral upper extremity proximal muscle weakness. This study compares clinical outcomes between anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) and posterior decompression (PD) with foraminotomy in patients with cervical spondylosis presenting with unilateral proximal muscle weakness.

METHODS

This study included 45 patients diagnosed with either cervical spondylotic amyotrophy (CSA) or cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) with unilateral proximal muscle weakness. Twenty CSA and five CSR patients underwent ACDF (anterior group), whereas 16 CSA and four CSR patients underwent PD with foraminotomy (posterior group). Muscle strength was assessed using the Manual Muscle Test (MMT) in the most improved muscle. Preoperative and postoperative MMT scores, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, and imaging findings were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean age at surgery was 63.2 years in the anterior group and 61.3 years in the posterior group (p = 0.31). No significant differences were observed in preoperative MMT (2.0 vs. 2.1, p = 0.75), JOA scores (13.9 vs. 13.5, p = 0.60), or C2-C7 angles (2.3° vs. -0.9°, p = 0.55). Postoperative JOA scores (15.6 vs. 15.1, p = 0.19) and C2-C7 angles (3.0° vs. 3.9°, p = 0.78) were comparable. Both groups showed significant improvement in MMT (p < 0.01); however, the difference in improvement between the ACDF and PD groups (2.5 vs. 1.9) did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative outcomes were similarly favorable for both ACDF and PD with foraminotomy, suggesting that each procedure represents an effective treatment option for cervical spondylotic disease presenting with unilateral proximal upper limb muscle weakness.

Для цитирования: Shibata Reo, Nagoshi Narihito, Yamane Junichi, Kono Hitoshi, Nishimura Soraya, Takeda Kazuki, Isogai Norihiro, Ozaki Masahiro, Horiuchi Yosuke, Ishihara Shinichi, Suzuki Satoshi, Okubo Toshiki, Matsumoto Morio, Nakamura Masaya, Watanabe Kota. Comparative analysis of anterior cervical decompression and fusion versus posterior decompression for cervical spondylosis presenting with unilateral proximal upper limb muscle weakness.. Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2025.09.009.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.