DOI 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.242
Myocardial perfusion in peripheral Raynaud's phenomenon. Evaluation using stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Peripheral Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) is either primary (PRP), without any coexisting disease or secondary (SRP), due to connective tissue diseases (CTD). We hypothesized that adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can assess myocardial perfusion in a population of PRP and SRP.
PATIENTS-
METHODS
Twenty CTDs, aged 30.6±7.5yrs., 16F/4M, including 9 systemic sclerosis (SSc), 4 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 3 mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), 2 polymyositis (PM) and 2 rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with SRP, under treatment with calcium blockers, were evaluated by stress CMR and compared with age-sex matched PRP and controls. All RP patients were under treatment with calcium blockers. Stress perfusion CMR was performed by 1.5T system using 140mg/kg/min adenosine for 4min and 0.05mmol/kg Gd-DTPA for first-pass perfusion. A rest perfusion was performed with the same protocol. Late gadolinium enhanced (LGE) images were acquired after another dose of Gd-DTPA.
RESULTS
In both PRP, SRP, the myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) was significantly reduced compared with the controls (1.7±0.6 vs 3.5±0.4, p<0.001 and 0.7±0.2 vs 3.5±0.4, p<0.001, respectively). Furthermore, in SRP, MPRI was significantly reduced, compared with PRP (0.7±0.2 vs 1.7±0.6, p<0.001). Subendo-cardial LGE=8.2±1.7 of LV mass was revealed in 1 SLE, 1MCTD and 2 SSc, but in none of PR patients.
CONCLUSIONS
MPRI reduction is common in both PRP and SRP, but it is more severe in SRP, even if RP patients are under treatment with calcium blockers. Occult fibrosis may coexist with the reduced MPRI in SRP but not in PRP.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.