MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/clinpract16080142

Медицинская библиотека · Clinics and practice · 2026

Reproducibility of Mandibular Cortical Index Classification Among Dental Examiners and a Single Generative AI Platform: An Observer Agreement Study.

Seki Keisuke, Kashima Minori, Akiyama Taiki, Kobayashi Atsushi, Dezawa Ko, Takeuchi Yoshimasa, Furuchi Mika, Kamimoto Atsushi

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Background/

Objectives

The mandibular cortical index (MCI) is a valuable screening tool for osteoporosis on dental panoramic radiographs, but its assessment is subject to inter-examiner variability. This study evaluated the reproducibility and inter-rater agreement of MCI classification by a closed-source generative AI tool (NotebookLM, Google) compared with eight dentists of varying clinical experience.

Methods

One hundred panoramic radiographs were classified according to the three-category MCI in two sessions held at least two weeks apart. Intra-examiner reliability, inter-examiner agreement, and agreement with a reference radiologist were assessed using linearly weighted kappa coefficients. The study was designed as a descriptive reliability study rather than a formal equivalence trial.

Results

The intra-examiner reliability of the AI was exceptionally high (κ = 0.987). However, agreement between the AI and the dentists remained at "slight agreement" or lower (κ < 0.2) for every pairing, with 95% confidence intervals that included zero; no formal global hypothesis test was performed, and these individual interval estimates should not be interpreted as proof of the absence of agreement beyond chance. A "two-level discrepancy," in which the AI interchanged Class 1 (normal) and Class 3 (severe), occurred in 10-18% of cases. The dentists showed a possible learning effect, with inter-examiner agreement improving between sessions.

Conclusions

Despite the high reproducibility of the NotebookLM configuration evaluated in this study, agreement with the dentists remained at "slight" or lower (κ < 0.2) in MCI classification. As classifications were not validated against bone mineral density or an adjudicated reference standard, these findings concern reproducibility and agreement rather than diagnostic or screening performance and characterize a single LLM-based platform rather than generative AI in general.

Для цитирования: Seki Keisuke, Kashima Minori, Akiyama Taiki, Kobayashi Atsushi, Dezawa Ko, Takeuchi Yoshimasa, Furuchi Mika, Kamimoto Atsushi. Reproducibility of Mandibular Cortical Index Classification Among Dental Examiners and a Single Generative AI Platform: An Observer Agreement Study.. Clinics and practice. 2026. DOI: 10.3390/clinpract16080142.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.