MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000348320

Медицинская библиотека · Neuroepidemiology · 2013

Prevalence of spinal cord disorders in Al-Quseir City, Red Sea Governorate, Egypt.

El Tallawy Hamdy N, Farghly Wafaa M, Badry Reda, Rageh Tarek A, Hakeem Metwally N Abdel, Shehata Ghaydaa A, Sayd Mohamed A M, Hamed Yasser, Kandil Mahmoud R

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The knowledge of the prevalence of spinal cord disorders (SCD) is important to understand specific causes in each part of the worldand to allow to potentially adapt health care and public policy including law enforcement to the main causes. SCD have important personal, biopsychological, socio-economic, short-term and long-term consequences. An SCD is the underlying cause for 1 of every 40 patients admitted to a major trauma centre. The affected population consists primarily of young male adults. The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence and cause of SCD in Al-Quseir City, using a door-to-door method. The total of inhabitants was 33,285 in Al-Quseir City screened by 3 specialists of neurology. Suspected cases were subjected to full clinical assessment and MRI or CT of the spine. The prevalence rate of SCD was 63/100,000 for the total population. Traumatic spinal cord injury had a prevalence of 18/100,000, while non-traumatic SCD was found in 45/100,000. Degenerative cervical disc prolapse was the most common aetiology of SCD with a prevalence rate of 27/100,000.

Для цитирования: El Tallawy Hamdy N, Farghly Wafaa M, Badry Reda, Rageh Tarek A, Hakeem Metwally N Abdel, Shehata Ghaydaa A, Sayd Mohamed A M, Hamed Yasser, Kandil Mahmoud R. Prevalence of spinal cord disorders in Al-Quseir City, Red Sea Governorate, Egypt.. Neuroepidemiology. 2013. DOI: 10.1159/000348320.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.