MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.055

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of emergency medicine · 2025

Emergency medicine updates: Evaluation and diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock.

Long Brit, Gottlieb Michael

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Sepsis and septic shock are common conditions evaluated and managed in the emergency department (ED), and these conditions are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. There have been several recent updates in the literature, including guidelines, on the evaluation and diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock.

OBJECTIVE

This is the first paper in a two-part series that provides emergency clinicians with evidence-based updates concerning sepsis and septic shock. This first paper focuses on evaluation and diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock.

DISCUSSION: The evaluation, diagnosis, and management of sepsis have evolved since the first definition in 1991. Current guidelines emphasize rapid diagnosis to improve patient outcomes. However, scoring systems have conflicting data for diagnosis, and sepsis should be considered in any patient with infection and abnormal vital signs, evidence of systemic inflammation (e.g., elevated white blood cell count or C-reactive protein), or evidence of end-organ dysfunction. The clinician should consider septic shock in any patient with infection and hypotension despite volume resuscitation or who require vasopressors to maintain a mean arterial pressure ≥ 65 mmHg. There are a variety of sources of sepsis but the most common include pulmonary, urinary tract, abdomen, and skin/soft tissue. Examples of other less common etiologies include the central nervous system (e.g., meningitis, encephalitis), spine (e.g., spinal epidural abscess, osteomyelitis), cardiac (e.g., endocarditis), and joints (e.g., septic arthritis). Evaluation may include biomarkers such as procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and lactate, but these should not be used in isolation to exclude sepsis. Imaging is a key component of evaluation and should be based on the suspected source.

CONCLUSION

There have been several recent updates in the literature including guidelines concerning sepsis and septic shock; an understanding of these updates can assist emergency clinicians and improve the care of these patients.

Для цитирования: Long Brit, Gottlieb Michael. Emergency medicine updates: Evaluation and diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock.. The American journal of emergency medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.055.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.