MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.04.015

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2012

Clinical application of combined fixation in the cervical spine using posterior transfacet screws and pedicle screws.

Liu Guanyi, Ma Weihu, Xu Rongming, Godinsky Ryan, Sun Shaohua, Feng Jianxiang, Zhao Liujun, Hu Yong, Zhou Leijie, Liu Jiayong

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The aim of the present study was to describe the clinical application of combined fixation in the cervical spine using posterior transfacet and pedicle screws. Ten patients with cervical disorders requiring stabilization were treated from May 2006 to December 2008. The operative details varied depending on indication, the need for decompression, and the number of levels to be included in the spinal construct. Radiographic analysis of the fusion was performed after surgery. A total of 23 transfacet screws were inserted at or caudal to the C4/5 facet. A total of 21 pedicle screws were placed. All patients underwent operative treatment without neurovascular complications. Fusion was achieved in all patients. When performed appropriately, the method of using posterior transfacet screws in the caudal cervical joints combined with pedicle screw fixation in the cephalic cervical spine is reliable and deserves more widespread use.

Для цитирования: Liu Guanyi, Ma Weihu, Xu Rongming, Godinsky Ryan, Sun Shaohua, Feng Jianxiang, Zhao Liujun, Hu Yong, Zhou Leijie, Liu Jiayong. Clinical application of combined fixation in the cervical spine using posterior transfacet screws and pedicle screws.. Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.04.015.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.