Rheumatology and therapy · 2025
Efficacy and Safety of Deucravacitinib, a Selective, Allosteric TYK2 Inhibitor, by Baseline DMARD Use in a Phase 2 Psoriatic Arthritis Study: A Post Hoc Analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Deodhar Atul, Nowak Miroslawa, Ye June Y, Lehman Tom, Banerjee Subhashis, Mease Philip J
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of background conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) use on efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib, a first-in-class, oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitor, in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
METHODS: This phase 2, double-blind trial randomized 203 patients with active PsA 1:1:1 to oral placebo, deucravacitinib 6 mg, or deucravacitinib 12 mg once daily for 16 weeks. Patients had failed or were intolerant to ≥ 1 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), glucocorticoid, csDMARD and/or one tumour necrosis factor inhibitor. Patients were not stratified by csDMARD use and were allowed one background csDMARD if used for ≥ 3 months with stable dose for > 28 days prior to day 1; patients could not initiate new csDMARD treatment. This post hoc analysis evaluated the influence of background csDMARD use on efficacy outcomes, which included American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 responses and ACR scoring components; Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores; Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Scores (PASDAS); and on safety measures.
RESULTS: Baseline clinical characteristics and disease activity were generally similar among subgroups regardless of csDMARD use. At baseline, 65.0% of patients were taking background csDMARDs and among these 84.1% were taking methotrexate; percentages of methotrexate use were similar across groups. Similar ACR 20 response rates at week 16 were observed with deucravacitinib treatment in patients with vs without baseline csDMARD use compared with placebo (deucravacitinib 6 mg: 57.8% vs 44.0%; deucravacitinib 12 mg: 62.8% vs 62.5%; and placebo: 31.8% vs 31.8%, respectively). Similar responses with deucravacitinib compared with placebo, regardless of background csDMARD use, were observed in individual ACR components, PASI score, and PASDAS. The safety profile of deucravacitinib treatment was similar in patients with and without csDMARD use.
CONCLUSION: Background csDMARD use did not affect the efficacy or safety of deucravacitinib in this phase 2 PsA study. Graphical Abstract available for this article.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ( https://clinicaltrials.gov ): NCT03881059.
METHODS: This phase 2, double-blind trial randomized 203 patients with active PsA 1:1:1 to oral placebo, deucravacitinib 6 mg, or deucravacitinib 12 mg once daily for 16 weeks. Patients had failed or were intolerant to ≥ 1 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), glucocorticoid, csDMARD and/or one tumour necrosis factor inhibitor. Patients were not stratified by csDMARD use and were allowed one background csDMARD if used for ≥ 3 months with stable dose for > 28 days prior to day 1; patients could not initiate new csDMARD treatment. This post hoc analysis evaluated the influence of background csDMARD use on efficacy outcomes, which included American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 responses and ACR scoring components; Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores; Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Scores (PASDAS); and on safety measures.
RESULTS: Baseline clinical characteristics and disease activity were generally similar among subgroups regardless of csDMARD use. At baseline, 65.0% of patients were taking background csDMARDs and among these 84.1% were taking methotrexate; percentages of methotrexate use were similar across groups. Similar ACR 20 response rates at week 16 were observed with deucravacitinib treatment in patients with vs without baseline csDMARD use compared with placebo (deucravacitinib 6 mg: 57.8% vs 44.0%; deucravacitinib 12 mg: 62.8% vs 62.5%; and placebo: 31.8% vs 31.8%, respectively). Similar responses with deucravacitinib compared with placebo, regardless of background csDMARD use, were observed in individual ACR components, PASI score, and PASDAS. The safety profile of deucravacitinib treatment was similar in patients with and without csDMARD use.
CONCLUSION: Background csDMARD use did not affect the efficacy or safety of deucravacitinib in this phase 2 PsA study. Graphical Abstract available for this article.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ( https://clinicaltrials.gov ): NCT03881059.