MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/brs.0000000000005519

Медицинская библиотека · Spine · 2025

Does Velocity of Return-to-Work Differ Between Circumferential Minimally-Invasive and Open Surgery to Treat Adult Spinal Deformity?

Macki Mohamed, Tawil Michael E, Alan Nima, Han Nathan, Prablek Marc, Le Vivian P, Aabedi Alexander, Park Paul, Uribe Juan S, Turner Jay D, Eastlack Robert K, Fessler Richard G, Fu Kai-Ming, Wang Michael Y, Kanter Adam S, Okonkwo David O, Nunley Pierce D, Anand Neel, Mundis Gregory M, Passias Peter G, Bess Shay, Shaffrey Christopher I, Chou Dean, Mummaneni Praveen V, International Spine Study Group

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

Retrospective matched cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare circumferential minimally-invasive surgery (cMIS) to open deformity correction surgery on patients' timing of return to work.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) impacts functional ability and quality of life, often influencing patients' ability to work. Surgical correction can improve alignment and symptoms; however, recovery timelines may vary depending on surgical technique.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data from the International Spine Study Group (ISSG) multicenter database was queried for ASD correction. Patients were evaluated in two cohorts: cMIS or open surgery. Propensity scoring matched age, body mass index, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch, and sagittal vertical axis. All patients had at least two years of follow-up. The cohorts were compared at six weeks, one year, and two years.

RESULTS

Of 173 matched patients (85 open, 88 cMIS), there were no significant differences in age, sex, or ASA classification. The average age was 68.2 years with ≥3 levels fused. The open group had significantly more direct posterior decompressions, a higher median number of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions, longer surgery time, greater blood loss, and longer hospital stay. The cMIS group had a higher median number of lateral lumbar interbody fusions. Baseline work status did not differ significantly: disabled (4.7% vs. 6.8%), working(20.0% vs. 21.5%), retired (71.7% vs. 67.0%), not working (3.5% vs. 4.5%). At six weeks, working patients were similar (14.1% vs. 15.9%, P =0.741); at one year, significantly more cMIS patients returned to work (10.5% vs. 21.5%, P =0.049). At two years, more cMIS patients had returned to work (14.1% vs. 19.3%), but this was not significant ( P =0.277).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing cMIS surgery returned to work at a higher rate between six weeks and one year postoperatively. At two years, return-to-work remained higher for cMIS but this difference was no longer statistically significant.

Для цитирования: Macki Mohamed, Tawil Michael E, Alan Nima, Han Nathan, Prablek Marc, Le Vivian P, Aabedi Alexander, Park Paul, Uribe Juan S, Turner Jay D, Eastlack Robert K, Fessler Richard G, Fu Kai-Ming, Wang Michael Y, Kanter Adam S, Okonkwo David O, Nunley Pierce D, Anand Neel, Mundis Gregory M, Passias Peter G, Bess Shay, Shaffrey Christopher I, Chou Dean, Mummaneni Praveen V, International Spine Study Group. Does Velocity of Return-to-Work Differ Between Circumferential Minimally-Invasive and Open Surgery to Treat Adult Spinal Deformity?. Spine. 2025. DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000005519.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.