MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.11.007

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of hand surgery global online · 2022

A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Various Treatment Options for Distal Radius Fractures.

Franovic Sreten, Pietroski Alexander D, Druskovich Katherine, Page Brendan, Burdick Gabriel B, Fathima Bushra, McIntosh Michael J, King Elizabeth A, Muh Stephanie J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To conduct a cost-effectiveness study of nonsurgical and surgical treatment options for distal radius fractures using distinct posttreatment outcome patterns.

METHODS

We created a decision tree to model the following treatment modalities for distal radius fractures: nonsurgical management, external fixation, percutaneous pinning, and plate fixation. Each node of the model was associated with specific costs in dollars, a utility adjustment (quality-adjusted life year [QALY]), and a percent likelihood. The nodes of the decision tree included uneventful healing, eventful healing and no further intervention, carpal tunnel syndrome, trigger finger, and tendon rupture as well as associated treatments for each event. The percent probabilities of each transition state, QALY values, and costs of intervention were gleaned from a systematic review. Rollback and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio analyses were conducted to identify optimal treatment strategies. Threshold values of $50,000/QALY and $100,000/QALY were used to distinguish the modalities in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio analysis.

RESULTS

Both the rollback analysis and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio analysis revealed nonsurgical management as the predominant strategy when compared with the other operative modalities. Nonsurgical management dominated external fixation and plate fixation, although it was comparable with percutaneous fixation, yielding a $2,242 lesser cost and 0.017 lesser effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

The cost effectiveness of nonsurgical management is driven by its decreased cost to the health care system. Plate and external fixation have been shown to be both more expensive and less effective than other proposed treatments. Percutaneous pinning has demonstrated more favorable effectiveness in the literature than plate and external fixation and, thus, may be more cost effective in certain circumstances. Future studies may find value in investigating further clinical aspects of distal radius fractures and their association with nonsurgical management versus that with plate fixation.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic/decision analysis II.

Для цитирования: Franovic Sreten, Pietroski Alexander D, Druskovich Katherine, Page Brendan, Burdick Gabriel B, Fathima Bushra, McIntosh Michael J, King Elizabeth A, Muh Stephanie J. A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Various Treatment Options for Distal Radius Fractures.. Journal of hand surgery global online. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.11.007.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.