The effects of systemic ozone application and hyperbaric oxygen therapy on avascular necrosis of the femoral head: An experimental study in the vascular deprivation of the rat femoral head model.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
This study aims to assess the effects of systemic medical ozone (O3) application and to compare its effects with hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy for preventing avascular necrosis of the femoral head in a rat model.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
A total of 50 male Wistar albino rats were divided into six groups including five rats in each control and sham-operated control group and 10 rats in the remaining four groups: (i) control group, (ii) sham-operated control group, (iii) avascular necrosis group, (iv) intraperitoneal ozone given avascular necrosis group, (v) HBO therapy given avascular necrosis group, and (vi) intraperitoneal ozone and HBO given avascular necrosis group. We surgically induced osteonecrosis by cutting the ligamentum teres and placing a tight ligature around the femoral neck. At Week 11, we harvested femoral heads bilaterally from each animal and performed a macroscopic, histological evaluation and histomorphometric, immunohistochemical analysis.
RESULTS
The intertrabecular mesenchymal cell ratio was substantially higher in the O3 group than that of all other groups in the histological evaluation (p<0.05). Group O3 had also significantly more CD31-positive stained new vasculature than other groups, with the exception of the HBO therapy group, according to the immunohistochemical analysis (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION
The results of this experimental study suggest that the application of medical ozone alone may have a positive effect on new vessel formation and the repair process and may be more beneficial than HBO therapy and HBO+O3 therapy in the vascular deprivation of the rat femoral head model.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.