Osseocartilaginous Rib Graft L-Strut for Nasal Framework Reconstruction.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
In the setting of major nasal framework reconstruction, it is critical to create a stable, warp-resistant L-strut to resist the contractile forces of healing to achieve a durable outcome.
OBJECTIVES
The authors sought to demonstrate the effectiveness of the osseocartilaginous rib graft for nasal framework reconstruction.
METHODS
Retrospective analysis was performed of all patients who underwent osseocartilaginous rib graft for L-strut reconstruction from 2007 to 2017 at a tertiary care hospital. Only patients with severe framework-only defects (Type IV, Daniel Classification) or total/subtotal nasal defects (Type V, Daniel Classification) were included. Primary outcome measures were: (1) maintenance of projection; (2) graft warping; and (3) graft resorption.
RESULTS
Twenty-six patients aged an average of 54.6 years underwent nasal framework reconstruction with an osseocartilaginous rib graft L-strut. Eighteen patients had framework-only deformities (Daniel Type IV) and 8 had total or subtotal nasal deformities (Daniel Type V). Twelve patients underwent reconstruction for autoimmune mediated deformity, 10 for malignancy, 3 for traumatic injury, and 1 for an iatrogenic deformity. Average follow-up was 21 months. There was no observed warping of the L-strut construct, and all but 2 patients demonstrated total maintenance of projection. Resorption of the caudal cartilage graft was identified as the etiology of partial loss of projection in 2 patients.
CONCLUSIONS
The osseocartilaginous rib graft L-strut provides a stable, warp-resistant construct for patients lacking major dorsal and caudal support, which may be applied to reconstruction of defects due to malignancy, autoimmune, traumatic, or iatrogenic etiologies.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.