MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00402-026-06333-0

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026

Antibiotic prophylaxis for open lower extremity fractures: a comparative propensity-scored matched analysis of cefazolin vs. piperacillin-tazobactam.

Mody Kush S, Ponna Anish K, Santilli Ryan T, Laychur Andrew, Galloway Joseph, Adams Mark, Reilly Mark, Lin Sheldon

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Optimal antibiotic prophylaxis for open fractures remains controversial, particularly regarding whether broader-spectrum regimens offer clinical advantages over cefazolin monotherapy. Despite guideline recommendations supporting first-generation cephalosporins for most open fractures, many centers routinely administer piperacillin-tazobactam. This study aims to evaluate differences in postoperative outcomes between cefazolin and piperacillin-tazobactam in lower extremity open fractures across all Gustilo-Anderson types.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was performed using the TriNetX database to identify adult patients with Gustilo-Anderson type I-III lower extremity open fractures who received either cefazolin or piperacillin-tazobactam. 1:1 propensity score matching controlled for age, sex, demographics, and relevant comorbidities. Outcomes were assessed at 90 days and 1 year using risk ratios (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 47,692 patients met inclusion criteria prior to matching. After matching, 1,527 patients remained in each treatment group for the combined type I/II/III cohort and similar matched pairs were obtained for type I/II and type III subgroups. At 90 days, cefazolin was associated with significantly lower rates of surgical site infection (RR 0.569), osteomyelitis (RR 0.292), sepsis (RR 0.244), reoperation (RR 0.474), readmission (RR 0.518), thromboembolic events (RR 0.480), AKI (0.448), and mortality (RR 0.208) across most analyses. Nonunion/malunion rates were similar between groups for type I/II and the combined cohort (p > 0.05), but higher among type III fractures treated with cefazolin (RR1.933). At 1 year, cefazolin was associated with significantly lower reoperation (RR 0.564), implant removal (RR 0.585), and mortality (RR 0.298) across all analyses, with persistently higher nonunion/malunion risk in type III fractures (RR 1.929).

CONCLUSION

Cefazolin was associated with comparable or superior outcomes to piperacillin-tazobactam for most postoperative complications following lower extremity open fractures. These findings support current guideline-aligned stewardship practices and question the routine use of broader-spectrum prophylaxis, particularly outside specific contamination scenarios.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III - Retrospective Comparative Study.

Для цитирования: Mody Kush S, Ponna Anish K, Santilli Ryan T, Laychur Andrew, Galloway Joseph, Adams Mark, Reilly Mark, Lin Sheldon. Antibiotic prophylaxis for open lower extremity fractures: a comparative propensity-scored matched analysis of cefazolin vs. piperacillin-tazobactam.. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-026-06333-0.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.