MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12891-022-05898-2

Медицинская библиотека · BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022

Breakage risk of different sacroiliac screws in unilateral sacral fractures a finite element analysis.

Ma Yupeng, Zhao Yong, Zou Dexin, Dong Shengjie, Sun Xiujiang, Cheng Gong, Lian Wei, Zhao Yuchi, Sun Tao, Wang Dan, Zhang Shudong

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To compare the breakage risk of lengthened sacroiliac screws and ordinary sacroiliac screws to treat unilateral vertical sacral fractures and provide a reference for clinical application.

METHODS

A finite element model of Tile C pelvic ring injury (unilateral type Denis II fracture of the sacrum) was produced. The sacral fractures were fixed with a lengthened sacroiliac screw and ordinary sacroiliac screw in 6 types of models. The maximal von Mises stresses and stress distributions of the two kinds of screws when standing on both feet were measured and compared.

RESULTS

The maximal von Mises stress of the lengthened screw was less than that of the ordinary screw. Compared with ordinary screw, the stress distribution in the lengthened screw was more homogeneous.

CONCLUSIONS

The breakage risk of screws fixed in double segments is lower than that of screws fixed in single segments, the breakage risk of lengthened screws is lower than that of ordinary screws, and the breakage risk of screws fixed in S2 segments is lower than that of screws fixed in S1 segments.

Для цитирования: Ma Yupeng, Zhao Yong, Zou Dexin, Dong Shengjie, Sun Xiujiang, Cheng Gong, Lian Wei, Zhao Yuchi, Sun Tao, Wang Dan, Zhang Shudong. Breakage risk of different sacroiliac screws in unilateral sacral fractures a finite element analysis.. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05898-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.