A simple laboratory algorithm for diagnosis of melioidosis in resource-constrained areas: a study from north-central Vietnam.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
Melioidosis may be endemic in many tropical developing countries, but diagnosis of the disease is currently unreliable in resource-limited areas. We aimed to validate a simple and cheap laboratory algorithm for the identification of Burkholderia pseudomallei from clinical specimens in parts of Vietnam where the disease has not previously been reported.
METHODS
In June 2015, we conducted training courses at five general hospitals in north-central provinces in order to raise awareness of the disease and to introduce a simple and cheap laboratory identification algorithm for B. pseudomallei including the three-antibiotic disc test.
RESULTS
Until the end of the year (7 months later), 94 suspected B. pseudomallei strains resistant to gentamicin and colistin but sensitive to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid were detected in clinical specimens from 70 patients. All strains were further confirmed as B. pseudomallei by using a specific TTSS1 real-time PCR assay and recA sequencing analysis. Among positive blood cultures, positive rates with B. pseudomallei ranged from 3.4% (5/147) to 10.2% (32/312) in the various clinics. A total of 82.8% (58/70) patients were bacteraemic, with a mortality of 50% (18/36) among patients with known outcome. No death occurred in nonbacteraemic patients.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results demonstrate that the introduction of a simple and easy-to-perform laboratory algorithm for the identification of B. pseudomallei from clinical samples, together with clinical awareness raising, can lead to the diagnosis of a significant number of melioidosis cases in resource-limited clinical laboratories which previously did not identify the pathogen.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.