MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/jebm.70140

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2026

Effectiveness of OsteoKing in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Randomized, Double‑Blind, Double‑Dummy, Positive‑Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Trial.

Wu Zhuoyun, Dong Shiyu, Ma Hongqing, Ma Yufeng, Zhang Kuayue, Wang Xuehui, Wang Hao, Du Shuangqing, Wu Wenjie, Fan Tao, Wei Jian, Wang Wenge, Han Yue, Ma Chao, Cheng Fuhong, Pang Yuan, Sun Rongxin, Zhu Ziqiang, Chen Linlin, Fang Wei, Liu Xiangrong, Qing Peidong, Mi Baohong, Chen Weiheng

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OsteoKing compared to a standard active comparator (Yaobitong capsules) for managing lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, positive-controlled, multicenter trial was conducted across 17 hospitals in China. A total of 210 eligible patients with LDH were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either OsteoKing (n = 140) or Yaobitong capsules (n = 70) for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score from baseline to week 4. Secondary endpoints included the Oswestry Disability Index score, the resolution rate of individual traditional Chinese medicine symptoms, and safety assessments. Missing data and repeated measures were handled using multiple imputation and a mixed-model for repeated measures.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were well-matched between the two groups. At week 4, both groups experienced substantial improvements in pain and lumbar function. In the full analysis set (FAS), the between-group least squares mean difference (LSMD) in VAS reduction was -0.37 (95% CI: -0.77 to 0.03; p = 0.074). In the per-protocol set (PPS) analysis, the OsteoKing group achieved a significantly greater reduction in VAS scores compared to the control group (LSMD: -0.41, 95% CI: -0.82 to -0.01; p = 0.0453). Improvements in ODI scores were comparable between the groups in both the FAS and PPS analyses (p > 0.05). Additionally, the OsteoKing group demonstrated significantly higher resolution rates for low back pain and fatigue/lassitude at week 4 (p < 0.05). Both treatments were safe and well-tolerated, with comparable incidence rates of adverse events (21.43% vs. 24.29%, p = 0.6396).

CONCLUSIONS

OsteoKing demonstrated comparable overall efficacy and safety to Yaobitong capsules in improving lumbar function and relieving symptoms in patients with LDH. Furthermore, OsteoKing may offer a modest, short-term analgesic advantage at the 4-week mark. OsteoKing represents a safe, effective, and viable conservative therapeutic option for LDH.

Для цитирования: Wu Zhuoyun, Dong Shiyu, Ma Hongqing, Ma Yufeng, Zhang Kuayue, Wang Xuehui, Wang Hao, Du Shuangqing, Wu Wenjie, Fan Tao, Wei Jian, Wang Wenge, Han Yue, Ma Chao, Cheng Fuhong, Pang Yuan, Sun Rongxin, Zhu Ziqiang, Chen Linlin, Fang Wei, Liu Xiangrong, Qing Peidong, Mi Baohong, Chen Weiheng. Effectiveness of OsteoKing in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Randomized, Double‑Blind, Double‑Dummy, Positive‑Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Trial.. Journal of evidence-based medicine. 2026. DOI: 10.1111/jebm.70140.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.