American journal of ophthalmology · 2021
Classification Criteria for Behçet Disease Uveitis.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) Working Group
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To determine classification criteria for Behçet disease uveitis.
DESIGN: Machine learning of cases with Behçet disease and 5 other panuveitides.
METHODS: Cases of panuveitides were collected in an informatics-designed preliminary database, and a final database was constructed of cases achieving supermajority agreement on the diagnosis, using formal consensus techniques. Cases were split into a training set and a validation set. Machine learning using multinomial logistic regression was used on the training set to determine a parsimonious set of criteria that minimized the misclassification rate among the intermediate uveitides. The resulting criteria were evaluated on the validation set.
RESULTS: One thousand twelve cases of panuveitides, including 194 cases of Behçet disease with uveitis, were evaluated by machine learning. The overall accuracy for panuveitides was 96.3% in the training set and 94.0% in the validation set (95% confidence interval 89.0, 96.8). Key criteria for Behçet disease uveitis were a diagnosis of Behçet disease using the International Study Group for Behçet Disease criteria and a compatible uveitis, including (1) anterior uveitis; (2) anterior chamber and vitreous inflammation; (3) posterior uveitis with retinal vasculitis and/or focal infiltrates; or (4) panuveitis with retinal vasculitis and/or focal infiltrates. The misclassification rates for Behçet disease uveitis were 0.6% in the training set and 0% in the validation set, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The criteria for Behçet disease uveitis had a low misclassification rate and seemed to perform sufficiently well for use in clinical and translational research.
DESIGN: Machine learning of cases with Behçet disease and 5 other panuveitides.
METHODS: Cases of panuveitides were collected in an informatics-designed preliminary database, and a final database was constructed of cases achieving supermajority agreement on the diagnosis, using formal consensus techniques. Cases were split into a training set and a validation set. Machine learning using multinomial logistic regression was used on the training set to determine a parsimonious set of criteria that minimized the misclassification rate among the intermediate uveitides. The resulting criteria were evaluated on the validation set.
RESULTS: One thousand twelve cases of panuveitides, including 194 cases of Behçet disease with uveitis, were evaluated by machine learning. The overall accuracy for panuveitides was 96.3% in the training set and 94.0% in the validation set (95% confidence interval 89.0, 96.8). Key criteria for Behçet disease uveitis were a diagnosis of Behçet disease using the International Study Group for Behçet Disease criteria and a compatible uveitis, including (1) anterior uveitis; (2) anterior chamber and vitreous inflammation; (3) posterior uveitis with retinal vasculitis and/or focal infiltrates; or (4) panuveitis with retinal vasculitis and/or focal infiltrates. The misclassification rates for Behçet disease uveitis were 0.6% in the training set and 0% in the validation set, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The criteria for Behçet disease uveitis had a low misclassification rate and seemed to perform sufficiently well for use in clinical and translational research.