MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11845-009-0432-3

Медицинская библиотека · Irish journal of medical science · 2009

The cervical spine of professional front-row rugby players: correlation between degenerative changes and symptoms.

Hogan B A, Hogan N A, Vos P M, Eustace S J, Kenny P J

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Injuries to the cervical spine (C-spine) are among the most serious in rugby and are well documented. Front-row players are particularly at risk due to repetitive high-intensity collisions in the scrum.

AIM: This study evaluates degenerative changes of the C-spine and associated symptomatology in front-row rugby players.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

C-spine radiographs from 14 professional rugby players and controls were compared. Players averaged 23 years of playing competitive rugby. Two consultant radiologists performed a blind review of radiographs evaluating degeneration of disc spaces and apophyseal joints. Clinical status was assessed using a modified AAOS/NASS/COSS cervical spine outcomes questionnaire.

RESULTS

Front-row rugby players exhibited significant radiographic evidence of C-spine degenerative changes compared to the non-rugby playing controls (P < 0.005). Despite these findings the rugby players did not exhibit increased symptoms.

CONCLUSION

This highlights the radiologic degenerative changes of the C-spine of front-row rugby players. However, these changes do not manifest themselves clinically or affect activities of daily living.

Для цитирования: Hogan B A, Hogan N A, Vos P M, Eustace S J, Kenny P J. The cervical spine of professional front-row rugby players: correlation between degenerative changes and symptoms.. Irish journal of medical science. 2009. DOI: 10.1007/s11845-009-0432-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.