Journal of orthopaedics · 2015
Radiological and clinical effect of prosthesis design in varus knees?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Isyar Mehmet, Guler Olcay, Cakmak Selami, Kara Adnan, Yalcin Sercan, Mahirogullari Mahir
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of the study is to investigate the efficacy of the prosthesis design used in total knee arthroplasty in patients with varus malalignment.
METHODS: After exclusion criteria we classified 90 patients underwent total knee arthroplasty according to prosthesis used into two groups: posterior cruciate ligament substituting and retaining. Mean follow up period was 25-98 months. We evaluated preoperative and postoperative radiological and as well as clinical parameters such as pain, knee function, flexion deformity.
RESULTS: We found statistically significant difference in both groups in terms of deformity correction (p = 0.000).
CONCLUSION: Prosthesis design affects radiological outcomes in varus knees.
METHODS: After exclusion criteria we classified 90 patients underwent total knee arthroplasty according to prosthesis used into two groups: posterior cruciate ligament substituting and retaining. Mean follow up period was 25-98 months. We evaluated preoperative and postoperative radiological and as well as clinical parameters such as pain, knee function, flexion deformity.
RESULTS: We found statistically significant difference in both groups in terms of deformity correction (p = 0.000).
CONCLUSION: Prosthesis design affects radiological outcomes in varus knees.