MedElevator
Войти в исследования Zhonghua yi xue za zhi · 2008
[Effects of adhesion releasing under nerve block and arthrolysis on adhesive scapulohumeral periarthritis: a comparative study].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Qing-Hua, DU Peng-Bin, Gong Hai-Tao
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of adhesion releasing under nerve block and arthrolysis on adhesive scapulohumeral periarthritis.
METHODS: Sixty patients with adhesive scapulohumeral periarthritis 24 males and 36 females, aged 52.5 (40 - 67), were randomly divided into 4 equal groups: Group I, undergoing adhesion releasing under brachial plexus block, Group II, undergoing adhesion releasing under stellate ganglion block, Group III, undergoing limited adhesion releasing under stellate ganglion block, and Group IV undergoing arthrolysis under stellate ganglion block. The clinical effects were recorded and compared.
RESULTS: The short-term effect of Group IV was significantly superior to the other 3 groups (all P < 0.05). The frequency of block + manipulation treatment of Group I was significantly less than those of the other 3 groups (all P < 0.01), and the frequency of pain point injection of Group I was significantly higher than those of the other 3 groups (all P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The 4 methods are all effective for the treatment of adhesive scapulohumeral periarthritis. In particular, arthrolysis under stellate ganglion block shows greater improvement in the joint function and less uncomfortableness caused by numbness and weakness of the arm.
METHODS: Sixty patients with adhesive scapulohumeral periarthritis 24 males and 36 females, aged 52.5 (40 - 67), were randomly divided into 4 equal groups: Group I, undergoing adhesion releasing under brachial plexus block, Group II, undergoing adhesion releasing under stellate ganglion block, Group III, undergoing limited adhesion releasing under stellate ganglion block, and Group IV undergoing arthrolysis under stellate ganglion block. The clinical effects were recorded and compared.
RESULTS: The short-term effect of Group IV was significantly superior to the other 3 groups (all P < 0.05). The frequency of block + manipulation treatment of Group I was significantly less than those of the other 3 groups (all P < 0.01), and the frequency of pain point injection of Group I was significantly higher than those of the other 3 groups (all P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The 4 methods are all effective for the treatment of adhesive scapulohumeral periarthritis. In particular, arthrolysis under stellate ganglion block shows greater improvement in the joint function and less uncomfortableness caused by numbness and weakness of the arm.