Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2024
Incidence of Systemic Vasculitis and Clinical Outcomes in Systemic Sclerosis: 2-Years Follow-Up of Asymptomatic Positive for Anti-Neutrophilic Cytoplasmic Antibody.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Suwannamajo Raiwin, Mahakkanukrauh Ajanee, Suwannaroj Siraphop, Foocharoen Chingching
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Anti-neutrophilic cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) overlap with systemic sclerosis (SSc) is uncommon. We aimed to determine the incidence of AAV and define clinical outcomes relevant to asymptomatic screening positive for ANCA in SSc after 2 years of follow-up.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was a cohort study of 185 Thai adult SSc patients testing for ANCA and having a 2-year follow-up at the Scleroderma Clinic, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. The incidence of AAV and outcomes of those who tested positive for ANCA were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 185 SSc patients were tested for ANCA, of whom 21.6% were positive for either cytoplasmic ANCA, perinuclear ANCA (p-ANCA), anti-myeloperoxidase (anti-MPO), or anti-proteinase3 antibody. Only one 52-year-old female patient with dcSSc, negative for initial ANCA test, developed AAV (microscopic polyangiitis) 7 months after the first ANCA test for an incidence of AAV of 0.27 per 100-person-years (95% CI 0.01-1.5). She was positive for p-ANCA and anti-MPO. Eight of those who had an initial test were positive for ANCA and underwent a repeated test. Only two cases persisted as positive for ANCA (1 anti-MPO and 1 anti-PR3) and had no clinicals suspicious of vasculitis. Four cases that had ANCA turned to a negative result.
CONCLUSION: AAV is a rare complication in SSc, so ANCA may not have any role as a screening test for AAV as it cannot predict the development of AAV in SSc. We suggest testing for ANCA only in SSc patients with clinicals suspicious of AAV.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was a cohort study of 185 Thai adult SSc patients testing for ANCA and having a 2-year follow-up at the Scleroderma Clinic, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. The incidence of AAV and outcomes of those who tested positive for ANCA were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 185 SSc patients were tested for ANCA, of whom 21.6% were positive for either cytoplasmic ANCA, perinuclear ANCA (p-ANCA), anti-myeloperoxidase (anti-MPO), or anti-proteinase3 antibody. Only one 52-year-old female patient with dcSSc, negative for initial ANCA test, developed AAV (microscopic polyangiitis) 7 months after the first ANCA test for an incidence of AAV of 0.27 per 100-person-years (95% CI 0.01-1.5). She was positive for p-ANCA and anti-MPO. Eight of those who had an initial test were positive for ANCA and underwent a repeated test. Only two cases persisted as positive for ANCA (1 anti-MPO and 1 anti-PR3) and had no clinicals suspicious of vasculitis. Four cases that had ANCA turned to a negative result.
CONCLUSION: AAV is a rare complication in SSc, so ANCA may not have any role as a screening test for AAV as it cannot predict the development of AAV in SSc. We suggest testing for ANCA only in SSc patients with clinicals suspicious of AAV.