Conservative Treatments for Lumbar Disc Herniation at L3-4 or L4-5 Were More Likely to Fail When Ipsilateral Foraminal Stenosis Was Present at the Caudally Adjacent Segment.

BACKGROUND

Conservative treatments are important in lumbar disc herniation (LDH), but predictors for poor outcomes are unclear.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with unilateral single-level LDH at L3-4 or L4-5 were enrolled. Baseline clinical data were collected, and lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging was evaluated. Foraminal stenosis was evaluated using Lee's approach and further categorized as absence (grade 0 and 1) or presence (grade 2 or 3). Each patient underwent conservative treatments (oral meloxicam and dexamethasone, corset, back extension exercise, physiotherapy, and manual therapy) for 6 weeks. Conservative treatments were defined as failed if a patient underwent surgery within 6 weeks or reported poor recovery at 6-week follow-up. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to examine the associations of failed conservative treatments with baseline characteristics and magnetic resonance imaging findings.

RESULTS

The study included 222 patients (mean age 45.5 ± 9.8 years). Of patients, 48 (21.6%) had concurrent ipsilateral foraminal stenosis at the caudal segment, and conservative treatments failed in 39 (17.6%). At baseline, patients with LDH and caudal foraminal stenosis were older (50.79 ± 6.14 years vs. 44.10 ± 10.13 years, P < 0.001), had greater leg pain (7.06 ± 1.17 vs. 6.39 ± 1.40, P = 0.003), and had a higher rate of positive straight leg raising test (54.2% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.008) than patients without caudal foraminal stenosis. In multivariate regression, failure of conservative treatments was associated with positive straight leg raising test (odds ratio 2.26, P = 0.046), and caudal foraminal stenosis (odds ratio 3.20, P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

In the presence of caudal foraminal stenosis and positive SLR test, conservative treatments were more likely to fail in patients with LDH.