Microvascular research · 2026
Carbon dioxide vs. warm-water hand baths in systemic sclerosis with secondary Raynaud's syndrome - A capillaroscopy centered randomized controlled trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schulz Nils, Hermann Walter, Müller-Ladner Ulf, Lange Uwe, Klemm Philipp
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) affects nearly all patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and causes substantial morbidity and functional impairment. We evaluated the immediate, segment-specific microvascular effects of a single carbon dioxide (CO₂) versus warm water hand baths in SSc with secondary RP, including healthy controls as physiological reference.
METHODS: In this single-centre, randomized controlled trial, 24 SSc patients were allocated (1:1) to a 15-min CO₂ bath (2 g/L, 35 °C) or warm water bath (40-42 °C). Twelve healthy controls received a CO2 bath. Nailfold capillaroscopy assessed vas afferens (VA), apex, and vas efferens (VE) diameters at baseline, immediately, and 10 min post-intervention. Primary outcome was immediate diameter change; secondary outcomes were persistence and between-cohort differences.
RESULTS: After CO₂ baths, mean VA diameter increased by 3.31 μm (95% CI [2.23,4.38]; p < 0.001) and VE by 3.83 μm (95% CI [2.28,5.39]; p < 0.001), both exceeding changes after warm water in SSc patients (p < 0.001; p = 0.005). CO2 induced dilation in healthy controls, but VA increase was smaller than after CO₂ in SSc (p = 0.010). At 10 min, VA remained higher in the CO₂ vs. water group (p = 0.006). No adverse events occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: A single CO₂ hand bath induced greater and partly sustained nailfold capillary dilation of the arterial limb and apex than warm water in SSc-associated RP. The lack of response to warm water suggests impaired heat-induced vasodilation in SSc, whereas CO₂ may engage alternative vasodilatory mechanisms. These findings support CO₂ hand baths as a safe, low-cost, non-pharmacological adjunct. Larger trials with clinical endpoints are warranted.
METHODS: In this single-centre, randomized controlled trial, 24 SSc patients were allocated (1:1) to a 15-min CO₂ bath (2 g/L, 35 °C) or warm water bath (40-42 °C). Twelve healthy controls received a CO2 bath. Nailfold capillaroscopy assessed vas afferens (VA), apex, and vas efferens (VE) diameters at baseline, immediately, and 10 min post-intervention. Primary outcome was immediate diameter change; secondary outcomes were persistence and between-cohort differences.
RESULTS: After CO₂ baths, mean VA diameter increased by 3.31 μm (95% CI [2.23,4.38]; p < 0.001) and VE by 3.83 μm (95% CI [2.28,5.39]; p < 0.001), both exceeding changes after warm water in SSc patients (p < 0.001; p = 0.005). CO2 induced dilation in healthy controls, but VA increase was smaller than after CO₂ in SSc (p = 0.010). At 10 min, VA remained higher in the CO₂ vs. water group (p = 0.006). No adverse events occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: A single CO₂ hand bath induced greater and partly sustained nailfold capillary dilation of the arterial limb and apex than warm water in SSc-associated RP. The lack of response to warm water suggests impaired heat-induced vasodilation in SSc, whereas CO₂ may engage alternative vasodilatory mechanisms. These findings support CO₂ hand baths as a safe, low-cost, non-pharmacological adjunct. Larger trials with clinical endpoints are warranted.