A systematic review on the management of idiopathic avascular necrosis of the scaphoid (Preiser's disease).

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for patients with Preiser's disease are challenging and varied. This article thus provides a systematic review of existing studies on the outcomes of the treatments for patients suffering from Preiser's disease in order to investigate the most appropriate management of Preiser's in each stage of the disease.

METHODS

We followed PRISMA guidelines while performing the study, and reviewed 107 papers in all languages from 1981 till November 2020 and included 42 studies that met the eligibility criterion. Studies investigating the outcome of one or more treatment options for Preiser's disease were eligible. Besides, quantitative analysis on 130 individuals (135 wrists) of the included studies was performed.

RESULTS

The results show that in stages II and III, pain score reduces more in surgical approach than in conservative treatment. In stage II of the Preiser's, Vascularized Bone Grafting (VBG) was more effective in pain alleviation and improvement in wrist range of motion (ROM) and Mayo Modified Wrist Score (MMWS) than immobilization. Proximal Row Carpectomy (PRC) in stage III causes more pain relief and ROM improvement than VBG and conservative treatments like prescribing NSAIDs. Inconsistent evidence was found in case studies of stage IV; however, they generally favour PRC and SILASTIC implants. Surgical studies of stage I are not yet enough for making a conclusive assessment.

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment outcomes seem more satisfactory in all Preiser's disease stages. Specifically, VBG for patients of stage II provided they have no scaphoid degenerative changes, and PRC seems more satisfactory for stage III.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; systematic review of case reports and case series on Preiser's disease.