MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/alr.22347

Медицинская библиотека · International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2019

Use of a crossing suture to correct caudal septal deviations.

Joo Yeon-Hee, Cho Hyun-Jin, Jeon Yung Jin, Kim Sang-Wook

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Septoplasty usefully treats patients with nasal obstructions caused by septal deviations. However, correction of a caudal septal deviation remains surgically challenging; no standard procedure is available, although various procedures have been introduced. In this work we propose a simple, safe, and time-saving technique for patients with caudal septal deviations.

METHODS

The medical records of 50 patients with caudal septal deviations who underwent septoplasty using a crossing-suture technique from October 2016 to October 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative nasal obstruction status and patient satisfaction with their surgical outcomes were subjectively evaluated using the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score and telephone interview, respectively. Pre- and postoperative endoscopic findings were evaluated and postoperative complications developing during follow-up were recorded.

RESULTS

The NOSE scores of all patients improved after septoplasty. The mean score fell from 13.46 to 3.97, and this change was significant (p < 0.0001). No complication related to use of the crossing suture was encountered.

CONCLUSION

The crossing-suture technique is a simple, safe, and useful surgical option for correction of caudal septal deviations.

Для цитирования: Joo Yeon-Hee, Cho Hyun-Jin, Jeon Yung Jin, Kim Sang-Wook. Use of a crossing suture to correct caudal septal deviations.. International forum of allergy & rhinology. 2019. DOI: 10.1002/alr.22347.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.