MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ajoc.2022.101486

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2022

First XEN implantation in Axenfeld- Rieger syndrome: A case report and literature review.

Mendel Liat, Eremenko Ron, Naveh Lilly Zborowski-, Kalev-Landoy Maya

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To present the first report of a XEN45 gel stent implantation in a female with Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome (ARS), a rare congenital anomaly caused by abnormal neural crest migration during early embryogenesis. This shows promise as new minimally invasive therapeutic option in the treatment of secondary glaucoma in ARS.

OBSERVATIONS: A 31-year-old female with known sporadic ARS was evaluated and treated at the Edith Wolfson Medical Center in Holon, Israel. The vision in her right eye was hand motion and 20/25 in the left eye. In the left eye the intraocular pressure (IOP) was up to 31 mmHg under maximal tolerated treatment. She refused Trabeculectomy or Glaucoma Drainage Device (GDD) surgery, but agreed to Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS). A Xen device was implanted in uneventful surgery. 15 months post operatively her IOP is 8 mmHg.

CONCLUSIONS

XEN implantation, when technically feasible, is a suitable procedure in ARS. This shows promise as new minimally invasive therapeutic option in the treatment of secondary glaucoma in ARS. This has particular significance as these patients often require surgery at a young age.

Для цитирования: Mendel Liat, Eremenko Ron, Naveh Lilly Zborowski-, Kalev-Landoy Maya. First XEN implantation in Axenfeld- Rieger syndrome: A case report and literature review.. American journal of ophthalmology case reports. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2022.101486.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.