Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
Diagnosing Plantar Plate Injuries: A Narrative Review of Clinical and Imaging Approaches.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Park Jeong-Jin, Seok Hyun-Gyu, Park Chul Hyun
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Plantar plate injuries represent a common yet frequently underdiagnosed etiology of forefoot pain and metatarsophalangeal joint instability. Diagnostic accuracy is often compromised by nonspecific clinical presentations and significant symptom overlap with other forefoot pathologies, including Morton's neuroma and synovitis. Early and accurate identification is essential to prevent progression to irreversible deformity.
METHODS: This narrative review synthesizes recent literature on the clinical evaluation, imaging modalities, and differential diagnosis of plantar plate injuries. A comprehensive literature search in a narrative review format of key databases and relevant journals was performed to critically appraise the diagnostic accuracy, advantages, limitations, and clinical implications of various diagnostic techniques.
RESULTS: Physical examination maneuvers-including the drawer test, toe purchase test, and Kelikian push-up test-provide important diagnostic insights but are constrained by operator dependency and lack of standardization. Among imaging modalities, MRI and dynamic ultrasound offer high diagnostic utility, with MRI providing superior specificity and ultrasound enabling functional, real-time assessment. Emerging techniques such as dorsiflexion-stress MRI and dual-energy CT show promising diagnostic potential, though broader clinical validation is lacking. Differential diagnosis remains a major challenge, given the clinical and radiological similarities shared with other forefoot conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: Accurate diagnosis of plantar plate injuries necessitates a multimodal strategy that combines clinical suspicion, structured physical examination, and advanced imaging. Acknowledging the limitations of each diagnostic modality and integrating findings within the broader clinical context are essential for timely and accurate diagnosis. Future research should prioritize validation of diagnostic criteria, enhanced access to dynamic imaging, and the development of consensus-based grading systems to improve diagnostic precision and patient outcomes.
METHODS: This narrative review synthesizes recent literature on the clinical evaluation, imaging modalities, and differential diagnosis of plantar plate injuries. A comprehensive literature search in a narrative review format of key databases and relevant journals was performed to critically appraise the diagnostic accuracy, advantages, limitations, and clinical implications of various diagnostic techniques.
RESULTS: Physical examination maneuvers-including the drawer test, toe purchase test, and Kelikian push-up test-provide important diagnostic insights but are constrained by operator dependency and lack of standardization. Among imaging modalities, MRI and dynamic ultrasound offer high diagnostic utility, with MRI providing superior specificity and ultrasound enabling functional, real-time assessment. Emerging techniques such as dorsiflexion-stress MRI and dual-energy CT show promising diagnostic potential, though broader clinical validation is lacking. Differential diagnosis remains a major challenge, given the clinical and radiological similarities shared with other forefoot conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: Accurate diagnosis of plantar plate injuries necessitates a multimodal strategy that combines clinical suspicion, structured physical examination, and advanced imaging. Acknowledging the limitations of each diagnostic modality and integrating findings within the broader clinical context are essential for timely and accurate diagnosis. Future research should prioritize validation of diagnostic criteria, enhanced access to dynamic imaging, and the development of consensus-based grading systems to improve diagnostic precision and patient outcomes.