MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2739/kurumemedj.ms652006

Медицинская библиотека · The Kurume medical journal · 2019

Clinical Characteristics of Relapsing Polychondritis: A Report of 8 Cases in Japan.

Tajiri Morihiro, Tominaga Masaki, Kinoshita Takashi, Nakamura Masayuki, Kaieda Shinjiro, Okamoto Masaki, Ida Hiroaki, Kawayama Tomotaka, Hoshino Tomoaki

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Relapsing polychondritis (RP) is a very rare autoimmune disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of inflammation and destruction of cartilaginous tissues. We examined the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of Japanese RP patients.

METHODS

We identified 8 RP cases in our department between 2003 and 2017. Detailed clinical features, testing, treatment, and outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 9 months. Four cases presented with auricular chondritis and laryngotracheal involvement and 3 cases presented with a saddle nose deformity. Anti-type II collagen antibody was positive in 5 of 6 cases. Of 3 cases with associated diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, ulcerative colitis, and Sjögren's syndrome), 2 died of respiratory failure.

CONCLUSIONS

When RP is diagnosed, early computed tomography or pulmonary function testing is essential to enable early treatment. Undiagnosed airway involvement can cause tracheobronchial wall fibrosis, leading to fixed stenosis.

Для цитирования: Tajiri Morihiro, Tominaga Masaki, Kinoshita Takashi, Nakamura Masayuki, Kaieda Shinjiro, Okamoto Masaki, Ida Hiroaki, Kawayama Tomotaka, Hoshino Tomoaki. Clinical Characteristics of Relapsing Polychondritis: A Report of 8 Cases in Japan.. The Kurume medical journal. 2019. DOI: 10.2739/kurumemedj.ms652006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.