Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2025
Metatarsal Pronation on Radiographs: A Prospective Reliability Study of Visual Rotation Markers in Hallux Valgus.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hamre Mikaela Engarås, Ræder Lise Benedikte Wendt, Riiser Martin Okelsrud, Schubert Peter Franz, Molund Marius
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Rotational malalignment of the first metatarsal is increasingly recognized as a key feature of hallux valgus deformity, but the reliability of radiographic rotation markers remains uncertain. This study assessed the inter- and intraobserver reliability of 4 commonly used radiographic parameters: metatarsal pronation angle (MPA), tibial sesamoid position (TSP), lateral head shape (LHS), and round head sign (RH).
METHODS: In this prospective reliability study, 3 senior clinicians independently evaluated weightbearing anteroposterior and axial sesamoid radiographs of 75 hallux valgus cases on 2 occasions. Metatarsal pronation angle (MPA) was measured as a continuous variable and analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Tibial sesamoid position (TSP), lateral head shape (LHS), and round head sign (RH) were graded using ordinal scales and assessed with weighted kappa statistics (κ). Subgroup analyses evaluated whether reliability varied by deformity severity (hallux valgus angle) or increased distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA > 10 degrees).
RESULTS: MPA showed excellent agreement (ICC = 0.81-0.94). TSP also demonstrated high reliability (κ = 0.88-0.98), although its value as a rotation marker is limited. LHS showed moderate to substantial agreement (κ = 0.59-0.85), whereas RH had fair to moderate reliability (κ = 0.35-0.66). RH was least reliable in mild deformities, whereas other parameters remained stable across subgroups, with slightly lower values in cases with elevated DMAA.
CONCLUSIONS: Conventional radiographs offer reliable assessment of MPA and TSP. LHS provides acceptable reproducibility, whereas RH is less consistent. These findings support the use of selected radiographic markers and suggest that further validation against 3-dimensional imaging and standardized grading frameworks may improve consistency and clinical applicability.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.
METHODS: In this prospective reliability study, 3 senior clinicians independently evaluated weightbearing anteroposterior and axial sesamoid radiographs of 75 hallux valgus cases on 2 occasions. Metatarsal pronation angle (MPA) was measured as a continuous variable and analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Tibial sesamoid position (TSP), lateral head shape (LHS), and round head sign (RH) were graded using ordinal scales and assessed with weighted kappa statistics (κ). Subgroup analyses evaluated whether reliability varied by deformity severity (hallux valgus angle) or increased distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA > 10 degrees).
RESULTS: MPA showed excellent agreement (ICC = 0.81-0.94). TSP also demonstrated high reliability (κ = 0.88-0.98), although its value as a rotation marker is limited. LHS showed moderate to substantial agreement (κ = 0.59-0.85), whereas RH had fair to moderate reliability (κ = 0.35-0.66). RH was least reliable in mild deformities, whereas other parameters remained stable across subgroups, with slightly lower values in cases with elevated DMAA.
CONCLUSIONS: Conventional radiographs offer reliable assessment of MPA and TSP. LHS provides acceptable reproducibility, whereas RH is less consistent. These findings support the use of selected radiographic markers and suggest that further validation against 3-dimensional imaging and standardized grading frameworks may improve consistency and clinical applicability.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.